18 June 2007: Bumi Armada Sailing Again???
See this posting The Pirates which seized the Armada
Ms. Claire Barnes of Apollo Investment Management wrote the following (here )
- To go back to the merits of the shares: in the five years since we first bought Bumi Armada, revenue has tripled. This corresponds to growth of 25% per annum, which is perhaps slightly higher than the growth in other aspects of the business, but broadly reflective. In purely qualitative terms, before thinking about valuation, this is one of the gems of the Malaysian market. It has an excellent service record, it has good relations with its customers in the offshore oil and gas sector, and apart from 1997, when it recorded unrealized FX losses on an appropriately matched loan book, it has sustained returns on equity of comfortably over 20%. It is highly cash generative, and when the Land & General stake was overhanging the market we put forward an MBO-and-buyback proposal which would have seen the debt paid down in short order while generating phenomenal growth in earnings, net assets, and cashflows per share. This opportunity was not taken, but delisting aside, the shares would remain attractive; the offer is far from generous, and clearly includes no premium for privatisation. We didn't sell at RM8.00 two years ago, and Mayban Securities on Friday published a buy recommendation valuing the shares at RM12.20, which is arguably conservative.
Bumi Armada reported earnings per share of RM1.01 for 2002, with an upbeat assessment of outlook for the year ahead, so is on a current-year PE of 6-7 - perhaps half that of the market, despite better-than-average business characteristics and growth prospects, although some discount is normal for illiquidity. In its recent announcement, it has however cut back on operational background, provides no details of major contracts, and omitted any final dividend despite its earnings growth. (This last has particularly incensed some minority shareholders who are surprised 'that Ananda Krishnan should be involved in such a deal'.) This reticence is unfortunate given the conflicts of interest involved.
In the event of a forced delisting, we believe that there would be a legal case against the directors and the controlling shareholders for oppression of the minorities, but costly and time-consuming legal action is a last resort for investors in any jurisdiction.
We were pleased to see that Mayban remains optimistic about Bumi Armada's prospects, but admit to being surprised by the timing. Maybank, its parent, was amongst those which originally jumped at the RM7. This must be proof of their Chinese walls - or of the different thought processes of bankers and investors. We are more impressed by this than by the role of RHB Sakura, which also agreed to sell its Bumi Armada shares in August, and wonder whether it was already advising the company or the buyer: as far as we know, the invitation was extended only to Malaysian banks, and not to a single foreign bondholder. Bondholders who expressed a desire to participate immediately after the deal became public were told that it was already too late - which is presumably lawful, but was certainly discriminatory, and not the sort of thing to make foreign investors think they are on a level playing field.
If an offer is mandatory, it is not necessary to have bureaucrats review the decision. In this case, the controlling shareholders have to pay RM7, but they only have to pay it much later to minorities than to the favoured few. In other cases, it might suit a cash-strapped acquirer very well to avoid a general offer altogether; again, why should officialdom help him? (To avoid any confusion, we would like to be absolutely clear: if a shareholder acquires control, there should be a general offer at the same price, but minority shareholders should be free to refuse.)
Information flows are important, and much more troublesome than they should be in the era of electronic communications. International investors frequently cannot obtain announcements and circulars through the global custody network in time to consider them adequately; frequently they arrive too late to meet corporate action deadlines. Listed companies should be required to copy the local stock exchange and international wire services with all announcements relevant to investors - such as announcements to Euroclear. This responsibility should not be left to companies: they respond when it suits them, and forget when it doesn't.
So Bumi Armada was highly rated. Growth of over 25% per annum, excellent service record, return of equity of over 20% and great cash flow.
Then out of the blue, Barmada (Bumi Armada), as Claire described "has however cut back on operational background, provides no details of major contracts, and omitted any final dividend despite its earnings growth."
And then it decided to announce to delist with an offer of 7.00! When Mayban conservatively valued it at 12.20.
And so Bumi Armada was delisted.
Remember back in 2002, Bumi Armada had an eps of RM 1.01 per share. Yes, an eps of RM 1.01! (you can verify it here: Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/12/2002 )
And it had growth rate of 25% per annum.
And Bumi Armada was delisted at rm 7.00.
That's an PE multiple of 7x.
Yup!
On today's newspapers:
'Bumi Armada eyeing US$1b from IPO'
Published: 2011/05/05
Bumi Armada's IPO, which will be one of the largest announced in Southeast Asia this year, was delayed several times in the past few years.
KUALA LUMPUR/SINGAPORE: Malaysian oil and gas services provider, Bumi Armada, plans to raise nearly US$1 billion (about RM3 billion) from its initial public offering (IPO), the largest offer in Malaysia since the listing of Petronas Chemicals last year, sources with direct knowledge of the deal said.
"It is a US$1 billion IPO, which values the company at about 20 times price-earnings for its 2011 earnings, and 16 times for 2012," a banking source said yesterday.
Bumi Armada's chief executive officer Hassan Basma could not be reached for comment.
The company filed a draft prospectus for its IPO with the country's securities regulator.
Bumi Armada said it plans to sell 878.6 million shares, of which 644.3 million are new shares and the rest are existing shares held by its present shareholders through the IPO.
The draft prospectus did not detail the timeline of the share offer or the composition of shares that will be made available to institutional and retail investors, as is the practice for draft filings in Malaysia.
Bumi Armada is an offshore support specialist and the only Malaysian company that owns floating production storage and offloading vessels, which carry a premium lease rate.
Bumi Armada's IPO, which will be one of the largest announced in Southeast Asia this year, was delayed several times in the past few years.
The company was privatised in 2003 by tycoon T. Ananda Krishnan, and a planned relisting in 2008 was delayed due to the global financial crisis. A subsequent relisting plan was also shelved.
One fund manager said the Malaysian market had appetite to support an IPO of Bumi Armada's size.
"I don't know whether it's the same company as it was in 2003 when it delisted, because I've been told they've injected other assets," MIDF Amanah Asset Management's chief executive officer Scott Lim said, adding that he needed more information on the company before deciding whether to invest in the stock.
The Malaysian oil and gas sector has been identified as one of the key economic areas under the government's economic transformation programme, which aims to boost investment and raise the national income level.
The country has also seen significant investment commitments from foreign companies, such as a total of US$4.9 billion (RM14.6 billion) by Exxon Mobil and Royal Dutch Shell, to develop new assets in the country, the government has said.
The joint global coordinators for the IPO are CIMB, Maybank and Credit Suisse, which are also joint bookrunners with RHB, CLSA and UBS. - Reuters
Link : here
The highlighted statement in red sticks out sorely.
The stock was delisted when the company made the privatisation offer at RM 7.00 in 2002. Bumi Armada specifically said did not want to remain as a listed entity. With the privatisation offer, they stated clearly they want to delist. They want out of KLSE.
The offer for the shares were based on an insane offer of 7 pe multiple. And it's even horrendous if one factors in the fact that Bumi Armada was enjoing a 25% annual growth.
Today the company wants to re-list
Quote: "It is a US$1 billion IPO, which values the company at about 20 times price-earnings for its 2011 earnings, and 16 times for 2012," a banking source said yesterday.
What? WHAT? WHAT?
Delisted at 7x pe. Now it wants to relist at 20x pe.
Hell yeah.
Life is apparenetly too great.
0 comments:
Post a Comment